﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Bluebit Software Support Forum / Technical Support and Help / Online Matrix Calculator </title><generator>InstantForum.NET v4.1.4</generator><description>Bluebit Software Support Forum</description><link>http://www.bluebit.gr/forum/</link><webMaster>support@bluebit.gr</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:09:42 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>Maximum matrix size increased</title><link>http://www.bluebit.gr/forum/Topic401-9-1.aspx</link><description>Hello all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Today we have increased the maximum matrix size for the &lt;A href="http://www.bluebit.gr/matrix-calculator"&gt;Online Matrix Calculator&lt;/A&gt;, to 30 rows by 30 columns.</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 05:57:34 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Trifon</dc:creator></item><item><title>Cholesky and transpose</title><link>http://www.bluebit.gr/forum/Topic605-9-1.aspx</link><description>Generally I really like this tool, especially being on the internet makes it very easy to test ideas quickly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Two suggestions:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1.  The Cholesky decomposition on the site sometimes fails for matrices which are rank deficient but do posses a triangular decomposition.  If you go to the wikipedia article on Cholesky decomposition, it describes a form with a diagonal matrix in the center.  If you do it that way (which is actually faster since it requires fewer square roots), and then take the square root of the diagonal matrix, you can always form a cholesky triangular matrix for all semi positive definite symmetric matrices.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2.  There isn't an obvious way to take the transpose of a matrix that I see.  I've been experimenting with a complete orthogonal decomposition algorithm which works by doing:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A = Q1 * R1&lt;br&gt;R1^T = Q2 * R2&lt;br&gt;R1 = R2^T * Q2^T&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A = Q1 * R2^T * Q2^T&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've been testing various small matrices by hand using the calculator to see how the algorithm works with different ranks, shapes, etc.  So I first QR decompose A, then QR decompose the transpose of the first R.  But to be able to actually do that I need to transpose the copy+pasted triangular matrix.  Right now I have to hand transpose it, which is a pain and error prone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, while I'm on the subject it would be nice to be able to construct a householder transformation algebraically.  So some way to add/subtract matrices, scale them, and do outer products on them.</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:12:28 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Numsgil</dc:creator></item><item><title>Weird values for 11x11 matrix inverted</title><link>http://www.bluebit.gr/forum/Topic567-9-1.aspx</link><description>Hello!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have tried to invert the following matrix:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;5405	1517	172	460	527	770	1032	563	182	182	4291&lt;br&gt;1517	1517	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1016&lt;br&gt;172	0	172	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	145&lt;br&gt;460	0	0	460	0	0	0	0	0	0	421&lt;br&gt;527	0	0	0	527	0	0	0	0	0	464&lt;br&gt;770	0	0	0	0	770	0	0	0	0	589&lt;br&gt;1032	0	0	0	0	0	1032	0	0	0	881&lt;br&gt;563	0	0	0	0	0	0	563	0	0	461&lt;br&gt;182	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	182	0	158&lt;br&gt;182	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	182	156&lt;br&gt;4291	1016	145	421	464	589	881	461	158	156	4291&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The result is really really strange, with large numbers which simply do not seem right. Also, as far as I can see, multiplying the inverse with the original does not yield the neat diagonal line of 1's I would expect.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Would you have any idea why that may be the case?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kind regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kong Georg</description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 07:55:43 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Kong Georg</dc:creator></item><item><title>Re: online calculator</title><link>http://www.bluebit.gr/forum/Topic513-9-1.aspx</link><description>Hey there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was wondering if the online calculator is good for finding eigen values and eigen vectors for unsymmetric matrices.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for the replies</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:45:11 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>vikram</dc:creator></item><item><title>trace - sum of eigenvalues</title><link>http://www.bluebit.gr/forum/Topic545-9-1.aspx</link><description>I submitted a matrix which I will give below. The trace was given as zero, the eigenvalues, when I added them up, summed to 1. I thought they should sum to zero (the trace). Can you explain what's happening?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here is matrix I entered:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0&lt;br&gt;1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0&lt;br&gt;1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0&lt;br&gt;1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0&lt;br&gt;1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0&lt;br&gt;0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0&lt;br&gt;0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0&lt;br&gt;0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0&lt;br&gt;0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0&lt;br&gt;0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0&lt;br&gt;0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0&lt;br&gt;0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0&lt;br&gt;0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0&lt;br&gt;0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0&lt;br&gt;0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0&lt;br&gt;0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0&lt;br&gt;0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1&lt;br&gt;0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1&lt;br&gt;0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1&lt;br&gt;0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 19:27:11 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>chrisnyc</dc:creator></item><item><title>Illegal values for Invertible Matix</title><link>http://www.bluebit.gr/forum/Topic542-9-1.aspx</link><description>This is the matrix I'm speaking of:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1 1 5&lt;BR&gt;1 2 7&lt;BR&gt;2 -1 4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your online calculator doesn't seem to understand that this is an invertible matrix, why is that?</description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:22:22 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>lionheart1983</dc:creator></item><item><title>Hello</title><link>http://www.bluebit.gr/forum/Topic540-9-1.aspx</link><description>I'm a big fan of online matrix calculator (I'm a computer sceince student and find it very helpful and convenient to operate so far).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;May I make a suggestion?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you add Diagonalizable matrix calculations, such as finding P and D matrices for a given matrix A such that: P^(-1)AP=D&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And D is the fitting diagonal matrix of A.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also study Machine Learning course, and one of the things I like in this course is to calculate myself the operations on matrices (filled with probabilities values). This means that I don't like to use Matlab, which is installed in my college's labs. So, checking on my calculations, I love using your online matrix calculator.</description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:28:45 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>lionheart1983</dc:creator></item><item><title>Welcome</title><link>http://www.bluebit.gr/forum/Topic394-9-1.aspx</link><description>Please post here your comments and suggestions for the &lt;A href="http://www.bluebit.gr/matrix-calculator"&gt;Online Matrix Calculator&lt;/A&gt; or report any bugs you have found.</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:44:33 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Trifon</dc:creator></item><item><title>Flawed LU Calculator</title><link>http://www.bluebit.gr/forum/Topic525-9-1.aspx</link><description>Hello. I believe that the way your calculator parses input is giving a flawed result for LU decomposition. Tell me if I'm wrong, but I believe that LU decompositions are only possible on matrices that use only Type III elementary operations. Here is an example, I typed in:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A =&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2 1 1&lt;br&gt;6 4 5 &lt;br&gt;4 1 3&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe your calculator parses that input and optimizes it to:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;6 4 5&lt;br&gt;4 1 3&lt;br&gt;2 1 1&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe this will cause a flawed result because you performed a Type I elementary operation by changing the rows. The U that your calculator returned was:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;6.000  4.000  5.000   &lt;---- Type I operation&lt;br&gt;0.000 -1.667 -0.333&lt;br&gt;0.000  0.000 -0.600&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I did it by hand by only using Type III elementary operations and I got U to be:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2 1 1 &lt;br&gt;0 1 2&lt;br&gt;0 0 3&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I may be wrong, but if I'm correct, I hope this helps. Nice work altogether though!</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:55:15 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>LUsuggestion</dc:creator></item><item><title>Determinant Bug</title><link>http://www.bluebit.gr/forum/Topic499-9-1.aspx</link><description>If the following is entered:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1470 -1000 5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-1000 1950 -9&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0 -270 9&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The returned calculation is 14576400.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It should be 23346400.</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:56:25 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Zytropic</dc:creator></item><item><title>Source code of Online Matrix Calculator</title><link>http://www.bluebit.gr/forum/Topic411-9-1.aspx</link><description>The source code of the Oniline Matrix Calculator is freely available in the attachment of this post.&lt;P&gt;After downloading and un-zipping the source code on your web server you will need to complete the following steps:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Add the files Bluebit.MatrixLibrary.dll and Xheo.Licensing.dll in the /bin folder.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Place a previously activated single machine license in the /bin folder&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Open and build the C# project.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 03:58:16 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Trifon</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>